A scoliometer reading below 5° is generally considered low. 7° is the threshold most screening programmes use to refer someone to a healthcare professional. These are screening guidelines — not a diagnosis, and not a measure of the spinal curve itself.
A scoliometer records the Angle of Trunk Rotation (ATR): how much one side of the trunk rises above the other when a person bends forward. Because it measures rotation at the surface of the back rather than the spine itself, a reading is best understood as a signal about whether further assessment is worthwhile — not as a number that describes the spine.
| Reading | Commonly interpreted as | Usual next step |
|---|---|---|
| 0°–4° | Low; small asymmetries are common in the general population | Continue routine monitoring, particularly through growth spurts |
| 5°–6° | Worth attention; the usual referral point for overweight children, in whom curves are harder to see | Re-measure carefully; consider professional review |
| 7° or more | The commonly accepted referral threshold in screening programmes | Seek professional assessment |
| Rising by 2° or more | Progression signal, regardless of the absolute value | Seek professional review |
Screening thresholds are a trade-off. Set the referral line too low and large numbers of healthy children are sent for imaging they do not need; set it too high and curves that would benefit from early attention are missed. Around 7° is where most screening programmes have settled as a workable balance, with 5° used for children who are overweight because a curve is more easily hidden. Individual programmes and clinicians may use slightly different cut-offs, and results vary based on age, skeletal maturity, curve type and the consistency of the measurement. In Singapore, the Health Promotion Board’s school programme is described in its patient-facing material as a clinical examination of the back — standing and on forward bending — with referral to the Student Health Centre where further assessment is needed; no ATR degree threshold is stated there. The 5° and 7° figures on this page therefore come from the international screening literature rather than from a local rule.
One Singapore-specific figure does exist, but it needs care. SingHealth’s guidance for general practitioners describes children with more than five degrees of rotation on the forward bending test being referred to the Health Promotion Board for further evaluation. That is a hospital group’s clinical-education article rather than a published operational standard — the Health Promotion Board’s own parent-facing material describes the examination without giving a degree cut-off — so treat five degrees as the referral practice described in clinical guidance rather than as Singapore’s official threshold.
That sits at the lower end of the international range. Much of the published literature treats 5° to 7° as the band in which a rotation becomes worth investigating, and these guides use 7° as the reading that clearly warrants a professional opinion. If your child’s reading falls in the 5° to 7° band, Singapore practice as described in that guidance would already treat it as a reason to look further — a good argument for recording the reading and repeating it rather than waiting for the next school year.
One reading is a snapshot. A series taken the same way, by the same person, at consistent intervals is far more informative. An ATR that climbs steadily over a few months is meaningful even while each individual reading still looks modest — and a reading that jumps once, then returns to baseline, is more likely to reflect technique than change. This is why recording the date, the region measured and who measured is worth the extra few seconds. For technique, see how to use a scoliometer.
In children and adolescents the concern is progression during growth, so readings are usually repeated more often — roughly every two to four weeks through a growth spurt — and a rising trend is acted on promptly. In adults, skeletal growth is complete and change tends to be slower, driven by degenerative factors rather than growth; monthly monitoring is usually sufficient, with attention to symptoms alongside the number. In both cases the referral thresholds above are a starting point for a conversation with a professional, not a substitute for one.
Seek an assessment if a reading reaches the referral threshold, if readings are rising over time, or if you notice uneven shoulders, a prominent shoulder blade, an uneven waistline or a visible rib hump on forward bending. Outcomes and appropriate management vary between individuals; a professional examination is the way to establish what a reading means for a specific person.
Available on iPhone and Android.
Reference: van West HM, Herfkens J, Rutges JPHJ, et al. The smartphone as a tool to screen for scoliosis, applicable by everyone. European Spine Journal 2022;31:990–995. This research assessed smartphone-based ATR screening as a method and did not evaluate any specific application.